A common question for recording musicians and engineers is whether to use a dynamic or condenser microphone. In this article, Joe Albano explores conventional advice to see whether they hold true.  

1. Dynamics are better for stage use 

Fig 1 L-R: Shure SM58 (classic indestructible stage dynamic), Neumann U87 (delicate studio condenser); Neumann KMS-105 (hardy handheld stage condenser)

2. In the studio, Dynamics are for drums & amps, Condensers are for everything else

Fig 2 Top: Standard dynamic drumkit close mics (L-R): Shure SM57, Sennheiser 421, AKG D112, ElectroVoice RE-20; Bottom: DPA miniature condensers as close mics on a drum kit

3. Condensers are better in the studio because they’re more accurate (have a flatter response)  

4. Dynamics are for louder instruments, because Condensers are more delicate

5. Dynamics are for people on a budget 

Fig 3 Top: medium-priced ($300–400) mics (L-R): Rode NT-2A, Sennheiser 421, AT 4033, AKG 214, EV RE-20; Bottom: Sub-$1000 mics (L-R): DPA miniature condensers, Sennheiser 441, Blue Blueberry & Dragonfly, Neumann TLM 102 & KMS 105

The Wrap

 

Joe is a musician, engineer, and producer in NYC. Over the years, as a small studio operator and freelance engineer, he's made recordings of all types from music & album production to v/o & post. He's also taught all aspects of recording and music technology at several NY audio schools, and has been writing articles for Recording magaz... Read More

Discussion

Want to join the discussion?

Create an account or login to get started!